| Super Fast Pulsar Discovery |
| anonymousgamer | Date: Saturday, 27.10.2012, 00:09 | Message # 1 |
 World Builder
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 1011
Status: Offline
| http://news.discovery.com/space....fbdsc17
390 times a second? Imagine standing on it (assuming you were impervious to gravity).
Desktop: FX-8350 4.0 GHz, 8 GB DDR3 RAM, EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW 8 GB, 2 TB HDD, 24 inch 1920x1080 screen
Laptop: Core i5 480M 2.66 GHz (turbo 2.93), 8 GB DDR3 RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6550m 1 GB, 640 GB HDD, 17.3 inch 1600x900 screen
|
| |
| |
|
|
| Aerospacefag | Date: Saturday, 27.10.2012, 00:16 | Message # 2 |
 Pioneer
Group: Users
Russian Federation
Messages: 401
Status: Offline
| anonymousgamer,
|
| |
| |
|
|
| HarbingerDawn | Date: Saturday, 27.10.2012, 00:49 | Message # 3 |
 Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| anonymousgamer, you missed the highlight of the discovery. It isn't newsworthy because of the pulsar's fast rotation; there are many known pulsars with faster rotational periods.
This discovery is remarkable because of the orbital period. The binary pair completes one orbit every 93 minutes.
All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
| |
| |
|
|
| duddy | Date: Wednesday, 29.10.2014, 21:52 | Message # 4 |
|
Observer
Group: Newbies
United States
Messages: 9
Status: Offline
| I know this thread is dead but i didnt want to make another one is there pulsars in Space Engine?
|
| |
| |
|
|
| anonymousgamer | Date: Wednesday, 29.10.2014, 21:59 | Message # 5 |
|
World Builder
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 1011
Status: Offline
| Well, pulsars are just neutron stars, and there are neutron stars in SE.
Desktop: FX-8350 4.0 GHz, 8 GB DDR3 RAM, EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW 8 GB, 2 TB HDD, 24 inch 1920x1080 screen
Laptop: Core i5 480M 2.66 GHz (turbo 2.93), 8 GB DDR3 RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6550m 1 GB, 640 GB HDD, 17.3 inch 1600x900 screen
|
| |
| |
|
|
| duddy | Date: Wednesday, 29.10.2014, 22:21 | Message # 6 |
|
Observer
Group: Newbies
United States
Messages: 9
Status: Offline
| Well I dont think they are the same pulsars spin faster then neutron stars so that does make them differant.
Or maybe pulsars somehow turn into neutron stars.
|
| |
| |
|
|
| anonymousgamer | Date: Wednesday, 29.10.2014, 23:43 | Message # 7 |
|
World Builder
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 1011
Status: Offline
| Quote duddy (  ) pulsars spin faster then neutron stars
That's pretty much the only difference. They also give off more radiation, but they are essentially just fast spinning neutron stars.
Desktop: FX-8350 4.0 GHz, 8 GB DDR3 RAM, EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW 8 GB, 2 TB HDD, 24 inch 1920x1080 screen
Laptop: Core i5 480M 2.66 GHz (turbo 2.93), 8 GB DDR3 RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6550m 1 GB, 640 GB HDD, 17.3 inch 1600x900 screen
|
| |
| |
|
|
| HarbingerDawn | Date: Thursday, 30.10.2014, 01:43 | Message # 8 |
|
Cosmic Curator
Group: Administrators
United States
Messages: 8717
Status: Offline
| Quote duddy ( ) pulsars spin faster then neutron stars
No, why do you say this?
All forum users, please read this!
My SE mods and addons
Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 970 3584 MB VRAM
|
| |
| |
|
|
| Watsisname | Date: Thursday, 30.10.2014, 07:59 | Message # 9 |
 Galaxy Architect
Group: Global Moderators
United States
Messages: 2613
Status: Offline
| All pulsars are neutron stars, but not all neutron stars are pulsars. What makes a pulsar a pulsar is that it strongly emits directed EM radiation, which appears to pulse over short periods due to rotation (classic 'rotating light house beam' model.)
What powers these beams is not simply the rotation, however. The beams carry away energy, but total energy is conserved. So they can't power their beams by rotating at a constant rate. That would violate physics. It is the slowing of the rotation -- the loss of angular momentum -- that does the trick. They can also be powered by decaying magnetic field. So, in general, it is the younger neutron stars that tend to be pulsars, and pulsars tend to decay into neutron stars after sufficient time. (Though they can be maintained or even 'spun up' by accreting from a companion star.)
The reason you don't see pulsars in SpaceEngine is that there is not yet a system in place that enables you to determine the difference. (Similar situation is also true for magnetars.)
|
| |
| |
|
|
| SpaceEngineer | Date: Thursday, 30.10.2014, 12:58 | Message # 10 |
 Author of Space Engine
Group: Administrators
Russian Federation
Messages: 4800
Status: Offline
| Also, not all pulsars appear as pulsars for us, because they rays must hit Earth to be detected.
|
| |
| |
|
|
| TemperateTerraIsBest | Date: Saturday, 14.02.2015, 06:03 | Message # 11 |
 Space Tourist
Group: Users
United States
Messages: 32
Status: Offline
| You spin me right round baby right around. 
Sample Text
|
| |
| |
ENG
New site
